On this last point, one comment came as a pleasant surprise to us, from a scientist who had recently benefited (his words) from preprints and PREreview. One of his lab's preprints was recently reviewed at a journal club and the review posted on PREreview. He and others showed appreciation for the work PREreview is doing. They believed, like we do, that early-career researchers (ECRs) need to be trained in peer review, and were encouraged that PREreview provides a way to spur community feedback and accelerate scientific dissemination. A few other people told us they often encourage their students to help with reviews. One scientist asked the journal if they could have their student participate in the peer-review process and they agreed. It was great to see that some PIs are already thinking about how to engage ECRs in the peer review process (an attitude that well reflects what many have reported in response to a recent survey ASAPbio conducted on peer review).